A circular economy could save China five trillion dollars

There are large financial and environmental benefits from reducing waste, says a recent report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

China could see big improvements in air quality, a reduction in carbon emissions and huge savings for business and households worth 32 trillion yuan (US$5.1 trillion) by 2030 if it moved to a circular economy, according to a recent report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

As China’s economy grows people are consuming a lot more. In urban areas, the amount people spent increased four times in real terms from 1995-2014 to about 17,000 yuan (US$2,700) a year, says the report. This will grow even more as rapid urbanisation continues.

Like other economies, China needs to ensure that people can enjoy higher standards of living but without the high carbon emissions, resource usage and environmental costs that come with industry and consumption based on a “take, make and dispose” model.

This means moving to a system that eliminates waste and pollution from product design and which finds ways to use materials and products, like cars, more intensely.

To do this, the report says that China must focus on change in three urban systems: the built environment, mobility and nutrition—and two industrial systems: textiles and electronics. This would reduce air pollution from tiny particulate matter by 10 per cent and greenhouse gas emissions by 11 per cent by 2030.

China was one of the first countries to discuss a shift to a circular economy in 2002. However, rapid economic growth, a manufacturing economy and growing domestic consumption have led to severe environmental problems, not least air pollution.

In recent years, the government has focused on remedying these problems through stronger environmental governance and enforcement under the concept of “ecological civilisation”.

For example, under the 13th Five-Year Plan (2016-2020), China has increased its share of renewable energy, taken action to improve waste management by banning 24 categories of foreign waste imports, and introduced a framework for extended producer responsibility (EPR) to drive improvements in product design and recycling, says the report.

This story was originally published by chinadialogue under a Creative Commons’ License and was republished with permission.

Advertisement
blog comments powered by Disqus
Asia Pacific’s Hub For Collaboration On Sustainable Development
An Eco-Business initiative
The SDG Co