Australian fashion companies use a “system of entrenched exploitation” that is trapping millions of garment workers in Bangladesh and Vietnam in poverty, campaigners said on Monday.
Nine out of 10 garment workers in Bangladesh and over two-thirds of those in Vietnam can’t make ends meet, with wages as low as 55 Australian cents ($0.39) per hour, according to a study by charity Oxfam Australia.
As a result, the workers, most of them women, often struggle to put enough food on the table and cannot pay for medical treatment when they are sick, Oxfam said.
“If we don’t see changes soon, we will continue to see a fashion industry that is perpetuating and fuelling a system of poverty,” said Oxfam Australia’s advocacy manager Joy Kyriacou.
“We will continue to see women who are running out of food and skipping meals every month, women who can’t live with their children because they can’t afford any childcare,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation by phone from Sydney.
Kyriacou said although fashion labels such as Cotton On, Target and Kmart have made commitments towards paying a living wage, progress to improve conditions across the supply chain in Australia’s $23 billion fashion industry remained slow.
A living wage means enough money is earned to cover basic needs such as food, housing, education and healthcare.
If we don’t see changes soon, we will continue to see a fashion industry that is perpetuating and fuelling a system of poverty.
Joy Kyriacou, advocacy manager, Oxfam Australia
A spokesman for Kmart and Target, both owned by conglomerate Wesfarmers, said the firms had been working with suppliers, workers and national governments to address the issue but did not give details.
Cotton On did not reply to a request for comment.
Australia last month became only the second country in the world to bring in an anti-slavery law, requiring large companies with a turnover of more than A$100 million to report on modern slavery risks in their supply chains.
The study said despite Australian firms’ pledge to improve workers’ rights, they put pressure on garment owners to drive wages down by using practices such as fierce price negotiation and short-term contracts.
Tania, a 21-year-old single mother in Bangladesh, told Oxfam she worked up to 12 hours a day for a $169 monthly wage, or about 55 cents an hour, and could only see her daughter, who lives with her parents in a village, twice a year.
Babul Akter, president of the Bangladesh Garment and Industrial Workers Federation, a main labour union, urged the government to ensure decent treatment for its workers.
“Since there’s a lot of competition among Bangladeshi factories internally, Australian buyers or any other buyers use this to their advantage and as a result give owners low prices that in turn affects the workers,” he said.
Clothes manufacturers in Bangladesh, the world’s second largest garment exporter, agreed to raise wages across 6 of the 7 pay grades in January after a week of violent protests, but it left the minimum wage unchanged at 8,000 taka ($95) a month.
Some 470 garment workers in Bangladesh and Vietnam were interviewed for the study between April and July 2018.
This story was published with permission from Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, climate change, resilience, women’s rights, trafficking and property rights. Visit http://news.trust.org/climate.
Thanks for reading to the end of this story!
We would be grateful if you would consider joining as a member of The EB Circle. This helps to keep our stories and resources free for all, and it also supports independent journalism dedicated to sustainable development. For a small donation of S$60 a year, your help would make such a big difference.