Fighting anaemia—a silent killer of women

A promising new study indicates that, with the right approach, anemia can be significantly reduced in as little as ten months. Given the prevalence and far-reaching consequences of this deadly nutritional disorder—which disproportionately affects women of child-bearing age in developing countries—implementation cannot come too soon.

 In public health, discussions relating to women typically focus on maternal mortality, malnutrition, and more recently, sexual and reproductive health. But one facet of malnutrition—and a major killer of women—is often ignored: anaemia.

anaemia is the world’s most common nutritional disorder, affecting more than 1.6 billion people. Broadly defined as an excessively low concentration of hemoglobin (an iron-rich protein that carries oxygen to tissues throughout the body) in the blood, anaemia occurs either when there are too few red blood cells or when their oxygen-carrying capacity is compromised. It is caused by a deficiency in essential nutrients, most often iron, but also folic acid, vitamin B12, or vitamin A.

Although anaemia can affect anyone, the majority of those affected are women of child-bearing age: in 2011, 29 per cent of non-pregnant women worldwide (496 million people) and 38 per cent of pregnant women (32.4 million people) aged 15-49 were anemic. The disorder was most prevalent in South Asia and Central and West Africa.

anaemia often goes undiagnosed, particularly in its earlier stages, but its consequences are serious. Iron-deficiency anaemia alone—representing about half of all cases—causes about a million deaths per year, some three-quarters of which occur in Africa and Southeast Asia.

Moreover, anaemia contributes significantly to maternal and perinatal mortality: in Asia, it is the second leading cause of maternal death. About one-third of all anaemia-related maternal deaths occur in South Asian countries.

To spur progress in addressing this pervasive and deadly disorder, in 2012 the World Health Assembly endorsed a comprehensive implementation plan on maternal, infant, and early-childhood nutrition, which included the target of reducing anaemia by 50 per cent in reproductive-age women by 2025.

To that end, the World Health Organisation recommends strategies such as improving dietary diversity; fortifying foods with iron, folic acid, and other micronutrients; and distributing iron supplements.

Although anaemia can affect anyone, the majority of those affected are women of child-bearing age.

That is a good start. The question is how to implement these recommendations, particularly in developing countries.

In a country like Bangladesh, daily consumption of micronutrient-rich foods—such as red meat, green leafy vegetables, and some nuts or seeds—is often not an option, owing to household financial constraints. Even if it were, lack of education about nutrition would hamper the necessary behavioral change.

But employers—especially those that provide lunch to workers—have the power to boost micronutrient consumption significantly among their labor forces, thereby reducing the incidence of anaemia. That is the conclusion of a recent study conducted by my colleagues and I at icddr,b, an international public-health research institute based in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

We began by developing several intervention packages, each involving some combination of nutritionally sufficient lunch meals, iron-folic acid (IFA) supplements, and nutrition-based behavior-change counseling (BCC). We then tested these solutions over a ten-month period on 1,310 women aged 18-42 working in four ready-made garment factories (eight in ten female garment workers in Bangladesh suffer from anaemia.)

The first set of women received a nutritionally enhanced lunch (with fortified rice) every day, one IFA supplement each week, and an “enhanced” BCC module (including information on anaemia and dietary diversity) each month. The second set received their usual lunch, no supplements, and a “regular” BCC module (including information about nutrition, but not specifically about anaemia or dietary diversity).

The third set of women—working at a factory with no lunch program—received twice-weekly IFA supplements (daily for pregnant women) and the enhanced BCC module, whereas the fourth received no lunch or supplements, and the regular BCC module.

The results were promising, to say the least. The implementation of a full nutrition package in the first factory reduced the prevalence of anaemia by 32 per cent. Even just the inclusion of IFA supplements and enhanced BCC sessions (in the third factory) brought a 12 per cent decline. Hemoglobin concentrations increased in both of these groups.

This reinforces the findings of separate studies, in which fortified foods caused the anaemia rate among participants to drop by 46 per cent over 6-11 months. Intermittent doses of IFA supplements reduced the prevalence of anaemia in menstruating women by 27 per cent.

In the icddr,b study, women from all four factories also reported a significant increase in knowledge of the main food groups, iron-containing foods, and the benefits of different vitamins and minerals as a result of the BCC sessions. But the actual results—including the regularity with which IFA supplements were taken—varied depending on the information relayed.

Among the second set of women, who received the regular BCC module and no other interventions, anaemia actually increased by 6 per cent. This indicates that dietary and nutritional adjustments—not social or demographic factors—make all the difference.

If the clinical evidence is not enough to convince companies to invest in combating anaemia among their workers, perhaps the productivity benefits will be. In our study, provision of a nutritionally enhanced lunch was associated with an increase in productivity: participants in the first factory were able to work more hours, and there were significantly fewer reports of common colds, urinary tract infections, and joint pain.

Nonetheless, we cannot count on companies to make the needed changes themselves. That is why icddr,b plans to engage Bangladeshi policymakers and other stakeholders who can effectively advocate for a comprehensive nutritional program to be introduced at all garment factories in Bangladesh.

We also plan to test the same packages in different settings—such as in schools or among domestic workers—in the hope that successful strategies can be rolled out more widely, especially in women-dominated workplaces. Such initiatives can serve as a model for other developing countries, where anaemia continues to damage—and even end—women’s lives.

Muttaquina Hossain is an assistant scientist in the Nutrition and Clinical Services Division at the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2019.
www.project-syndicate.org

Thanks for reading to the end of this story!

We would be grateful if you would consider joining as a member of The EB Circle. This helps to keep our stories and resources free for all, and it also supports independent journalism dedicated to sustainable development. For a small donation of S$60 a year, your help would make such a big difference.

Find out more and join The EB Circle

blog comments powered by Disqus

Most popular

View all news

Industry Spotlight

View all
Asia Pacific’s Hub For Collaboration On Sustainable Development
An Eco-Business initiative
The SDG Co