The Malaysian government has called on its neighbours to help defend the palm oil industry against what it deems a discriminative campaign by the European Union to stop recognising the commodity as a biofuel ingredient.
Teresa Kok, Malaysia’s minister of primary industries, said this past week that member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), should support one another against outside threats to an industry as important to the region as palm oil.
Malaysia is the world’s second-biggest producer of palm oil, behind Indonesia; together, the two countries supply more than 80 per cent of the world’s palm oil, a commodity used in items ranging from toothpaste and coffee creamer, to cookies and biodiesel.
“If the EU countries can stand united on assumptions of unsustainable production and consumption of palm oil and other forest-based products, we as ASEAN should stand tall to fight against those unfair and discriminative judgments made by them,” Kok said in her May 2 speech at the Singapore Dialogue on Sustainable World Resources.
Her statement marks the latest backlash by Malaysian and Indonesian officials against the European Union’s move to curb the use of crops that cause deforestation in transportation fuel, over concerns that their production contributes to global carbon emissions. The European Commission in March approved a measure to phase out palm oil-based biofuel by 2030.
If you are a palm oil producer you must be a maniac running around with a chainsaw and cutting 50 football field equivalents of forests each day.
Teresa Kok, Minister of Primary Industries, Malaysia
‘Maniac with a chainsaw’
Kok said palm oil had been unfairly targeted by a global network of campaigns that she called “extremely provocative and belittling” to producing countries like Malaysia.
“There is relentless accusation of deforestation, wildlife destruction, social injustices to the plantation workforce, and stigmatisation against palm oil from its nutrition and health perspectives,” she said.
“If you are a palm oil producer you must be a maniac running around with a chainsaw and cutting 50 football field equivalents of forests each day,” she added. “Such narratives are common, and yet intellectuals, perhaps even in this room, believe such absurdities.”
Kok said the Malaysian government had undertaken efforts to improve the sustainability of its palm oil industry and address concerns such as deforestation. A widely cited figure from WWF suggests that 300 football fields of forest are cleared every hour to make way for palm plantations. But Kok said Malaysia had been able to retain about 54.8 per cent of its total land area under forest cover in 2017.
“The world often finds this difficult to assimilate,” she said.
Kok also cited other recent initiatives, such as the government’s decision to cap the expansion of oil palm plantations at 65,000 square kilometres (25,000 square miles) by 2023; the current planted area stands at 58,500 square kilometres (22,600 square miles).
“Our focus now is in utilising higher-yielding planting materials and increasing productivity without the need to expand into new forests or peatlands,” Kok said. “This means we can progressively achieve oil yields from the current 4 metric tons per hectare, which is already four to 10 times higher than all other oilseeds, to at least 6 to 8 metric tons per hectare.”
She also cited a prohibition on cultivating on peatland and the tightening of regulations on existing plantations on peat.
“Besides that, we are also planning to carry out mapping of oil palm plantations throughout the country for public access to enhance transparency,” she said.
Kok added Malaysia had introduced its own sustainability certification scheme, Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO), with a goal to certify all plantations and mills by the end of 2019.
‘Boycotting is not effective’
Despite her call for regional support, the Malaysian minister made of point of criticising dialogue host Singapore over what she called its “active anti-palm agenda.” She didn’t elaborate on specific policies, but cited the case of Singapore Zoo, which she suggested was engaged in a public education campaign to vilify palm oil.
“The Singapore Zoo has on several occasions created sensationalised displays on palm oil and deforestation at its orangutan enclosures,” Kok said. “These damage the image of palm oil-producing countries within this region despite progressive efforts toward sustainability and wildlife conservation. In this case, Singapore Zoo acted possibly in haste and reflecting emotions expressed by many ill-informed visitors.”
She also criticised the zoo for failing to acknowledge Malaysia’s efforts in protecting its wildlife.
“We have also contributed funds for wildlife conservation in Sabah [state] to protect iconic species such as the orangutan, Borneo pygmy elephants, sun bears and others,” she said. “I think the curators at the Singapore Zoo should take note of such efforts before you put up anti-palm oil signage.”
Singapore is home to the headquarters of some of the world’s biggest palm oil companies and its banks are financing the expansion of the industry in Malaysia and Indonesia as well as further afield.
Given the efficiency of palm oil production and its ubiquitous use, WRS believes that boycotting of the palm oil industry is not effective.
Mike Barclay, chief executive, Mandai Park Holdings
In response to Kok’s criticism, Wildlife Reserves Singapore (WRS), the organisation that runs Singapore Zoo, said it wasn’t advocating for a boycott of palm oil products through its signage, but rather for the sustainable production of the commodity. WRS also noted that it was an active member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), the world’s leading certification body for ethically sourced palm oil.
“We recognise that palm oil is the highest-yielding source of vegetable oil and the palm oil industry creates stable employment for many people across the region,” Mike Barclay, chief executive of Mandai Park Holdings, WRS’s parent entity, told Mongabay. “Given the efficiency of palm oil production and its ubiquitous use, WRS believes that boycotting of the palm oil industry is not effective.”
He added that WRS would continue working to raise awareness about conversation issues among the zoo’s visitors, as part of its mission of educating the public.
Sustainability standards and deforestation
While both the Malaysian and Indonesian governments have instated policies to curb the clearing of rainforest for palm plantations, there still remain challenges to ensuring sustainability across the wider industry, environmental activists say.
Kiki Taufik, the head of Greenpeace Indonesia’s forest campaign, said much work still needed to be done toward developing a globally recognised sustainability certification scheme. Indonesia and Malaysia have their own schemes, called ISPO and MSPO, respectively, but both are widely regarded to be less stringent than the RSPO.
The RSPO, in turn, has long attracted criticism of its own failings, including the lack of meaningful disincentives for member companies that routinely flout its standards. A 2017 report by the Forest Peoples Programme (FPP), an international NGO, put MSPO and ISPO at the bottom of the list of certification schemes for edible oils and biofuels.
Kiki said he fully agreed with Kok that ASEAN countries should unite—but not to retaliate against the EU, which he said wouldn’t solve anything.
“Countries like Malaysia and Indonesia indeed need to band together to improve forest and peat management, and that includes the palm oil sector,” Kiki told Mongabay on the sidelines of the Singapore dialogue, “so that they can create a system that gains the full trust of other countries.”
Even so, forest loss remains a major problem, said Nigel Sizer, chief program officer of the Rainforest Alliance.
He cited recent tropical deforestation data released by the World Resources Institute (WRI) that showed the planet lost another 36,400 square kilometres (14,000 square miles) of primary rainforest in 2018, a jump from the annual average and the third-highest level since 2002.
While the report singled out Indonesia as a bright spot, after it experienced the biggest decline in its deforestation rate, the country still lost 3,400 square kilometres (1,300 square miles) of its forest in 2018; Malaysia lost 1,445 square kilometres (560 square miles).
“The challenge continues to be huge,” Sizer said at the dialogue. “Indonesia, despite the tremendous progress we’ve seen in the last few years, is still number three in the loss of primary tropical rainforest in the world. Malaysia’s number six in the world in terms of loss of primary rainforest.”
This story was published with permission from Mongabay.com
Thanks for reading to the end of this story!
We would be grateful if you would consider joining as a member of The EB Circle. This helps to keep our stories and resources free for all, and it also supports independent journalism dedicated to sustainable development. For a small donation of S$60 a year, your help would make such a big difference.