With rapidly dwindling water supplies, Cape Town is making headlines as a city in the throes of a crisis. Residents, already experiencing impacts on their businesses and lives, are bracing for the worst as the government is forced to implement draconian water restrictions. As the world watches a city on edge, we need to ask ourselves: is this a forewarning of futures elsewhere?
Cape Town is one vivid example of a world struggling with increasingly complex water-related problems. Population growth and economic development mean rapidly increasing demand. Agricultural intensification, urbanisation and industrialisation are impacting pollution levels. Climate change is contributing to extremes in water availability, with more frequent and more costly floods and droughts.
And water risks are hitting our economies. The World Economic Forum has rated extreme weather, water shortages, natural disasters and a failure to prepare for climate change as four of the top five risks to future economic growth. All four relate directly or indirectly to water. They also assert that changes in climate could “trigger or exacerbate societal risks such as domestic or regional conflict and involuntary migration.” In some areas of the Middle East, water scarcity is believed to have contributed to civil unrest and political upheaval. At the other extreme, increased flooding across South Asia regularly affects millions of smallholder farmers, causing billions of dollars of damage to crops, livestock and homes.
Against this backdrop, it’s clear that we need fundamental shifts in the way we manage water. We need a systems view of the interconnected challenges with solutions to address the complexity. How can we do this? Part of the answer lies in recognising the contribution of natural infrastructure—forests, swamps, aquifers, grasslands and other resources often taken for granted—to our economic growth and climate resilience.
Natural ifnrastructure vital for people and economies
We are beginning to understand the value of these benefits to societies and economies. For example, in Southeast Asia, calculations estimate that natural infrastructure underpins between 20 and 55 per cent of the total wealth in the rapidly growing Greater Mekong Sub-region.
And natural infrastructure is of particular importance for the poor. For example, wetlands such as swamps or shallow ponds benefit livelihoods by delivering clean and reliable water for domestic use and agriculture, as well as fish, medicinal plants and construction materials for houses. In Brazil alone, an estimated 75 per cent of the GDP of poor households rely on natural infrastructure, benefiting 18 million people. In Indonesia the equivalent is 89 per cent, benefiting 25 million people.
In Africa, research in Kenya’s Tana River Basin has highlighted the value of natural infrastructure for local people. Floodplains, forests and other infrastructure provide not only services such as storage and filtering of water, but also improve the performance of built infrastructure. For example for hydropower dams, natural infrastructure regulates water flow and reduces sediment in reservoirs, increasing power generation potential.
But if we undervalue natural infrastructure’s contributions, we risk further overexploitation and degradation of water and ecosystems. This has often brought dire long-term consequences. Central Asia’s Aral Sea disaster is a case in point. Once the world’s fourth largest saline lake, it has nearly dried up as a consequence of water mismanagement.
The invisible resource of groundwater has also been severely mismanaged. India’s national economy has been coping with the massive costs of aquifer depletion in Punjab state and elsewhere. The same problem plagues numerous aquifers in Africa and North America.
It’s clear that we need fundamental shifts in the way we manage water…Part of the answer lies in recognising the contribution of natural infrastructure to our economic growth and climate resilience.
More research needed
Building natural infrastructure into water planning is not straightforward. We have inadequate understanding of its true economic value. Just as with built infrastructure, engineers need to know how it functions under different conditions. And they need to calculate the economic returns or costs related to good or poor management. More research is needed, particularly as climate change increases uncertainty over the supply and demand of natural services and resources.
But around the world, we are making headway. In Nepal, International Water Management Institute scientists are working with the government to test interventions that improve water availability and flows. These range from terracing and forest rehabilitation to the construction of infiltration ponds that help to recharge springs. In Africa, we are developing a method for determining flow requirements in rivers that considers both ecological and social needs. Tools like this help decision-makers incorporate natural infrastructure into the planning and management of water—a key first step.
Only by prioritising natural infrastructure will decision makers be able to overcome the daunting water-related problems being faced around the globe. As the world heads toward more crises like Cape Town—or perhaps even worse—we either wisely protect the assets provided by the natural environment, or risk our miscalculations harming generations to come.
The authors are senior researchers with the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and its CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). IWMI and WLE are non-profit organisations researching water and ecosystem solutions for sustainable agriculture. This story was published with permission from Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, women’s rights, corruption and climate change. Visit news.trust.org.