Expanding the volume of global carbon markets

Grenatec principal Stewart Taggart highlights ways to make carbon markets more economically viable, and harness their power to mitigate climate change.

brown coal plant pollution
Emissions from a brown coal power plant. In a carbon market, a government issues a limited number of permits, which companies can then trade in return for the right to emit a certain amount of the pollutant. Image: Shutterstock

Raising carbon prices, eliminating fossil fuel subsidies, reducing carbon pollution-related health care costs. These will transform reducing climate change into a global wealth creation engine.  

The most important of the three is eliminating the current $5.3 trillion of annual world fossil fuel subsidies. The Group of Seven has pledged to do this for the world’s largest economies by 2025. The rest of the world can follow. Everyone will gain.

The second is to raise carbon prices on the world’s 40 billion tonnes of annual emissions from their current weighted average of around three dollars per tonne to $50 per tonne - a  future level many energy corporates are already budgeting in their investment planning.  

As subsidies disappear and carbon prices rise, economic behavior will change. Carbon emissions will fall. This will spur a virtuous circle of reduced heath costs, better investment decisions and heightened economic growth.

Taken together, these overdue reforms will more than pay for themselves. When they’re done repairing the damage of climate change, they can then be progressively applied (around 2035 or so) to paying the costs of an aging global population.

Consider the numbers: eliminated fossil fuel subsidies will free up $5.3 trillion, falling health costs of dealing with climate change could save another $1-2 trillion, while raising carbon prices to $50 per tonne by around 2040 will free up another $2 trillion a year.

Today’s $500 billion climate change economic reform ‘market’ will grow to a nearly $9 trillion dollar market by 2040. Sources: World Bank. International Energy Agency, Group of Seven, Harvard Medical School

Together, these three key policy changes (higher carbon prices and eliminated subsides) and economic benefits (reduced health care outlays) will redeploy as much as $9 trillion a year (roughly seven percent of the world economy) to to better uses.

Today’s $500 billion climate change economic reform ‘market’ will grow to nearly seven percent of the global economy around 2031 before tapering off as economic growth increases and fossil fuel subsidies reach zero. Sources: World Bank. International Energy Agency, Group of Seven, Harvard Medical School.

After that point, numbers will fall.

Fossil fuel subsides will hit zero and higher carbon prices applied to shrinking emissions will reduce the growth of redeployable capital from that crucial economic reform. Despite all this, the shrinking benefits of reform will still amount to roughly five percent of the global economy in 2050.

The indirect benefits will be enormous. Energy market reform (desirable in itself) encouraging cleaner, more abundant renewable energy resources will reduce geopolitical tension over access to fossil fuel resources.

Large amounts of redeployable capital created by properly pricing climate change can be plowed back into infrastructure to raise economic growth. This will raise the global economic growth rate, reducing the medium-term drag of higher carbon prices and eliminated price subsidies.

As subsidies disappear and carbon prices rise, economic behavior will change. Carbon emissions will fall. This will spur a virtuous circle of reduced heath costs, better investment decisions and heightened economic growth.

Never in the history of economics has a global macroeconomic problem presented itself with such a clear and unambiguous set of policy solutions.

The policy mix is clear. The world needs certainty. Eliminating fossil fuel subsidies and creating a multi-decade rising price curve for carbon will enable clearer discounting of future investment.

For their part, fossil fuel subsidies can be reduced on a straight line basis. Achieving predictability in carbon levies can be achieved through carbon trading applied to an ever greater proportion of carbon emissions coupled by a minimum floor price below which carbon prices can’t fall.

This has been the current fatal flaw of carbon markets to date. Already, forward looking jurisdictions like Alberta, Canada are considering such hybrid systems. Australia implemented one before a change of government abolished it. Australia’s new government, therefore, has an off-the-shelf system it can reimpose.

The European Union is well aware of the minium price problem and all but certainly will include that in 2020 reforms to the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). China has taken note, and almost certainly will incorporate price floors into its various regional carbon trading markets.

With greater policy certainty such as the above, carbon futures markets can allow better management of private risk. America’s NASDAQ system already offers futures contracts out to 2020 on the EU ETS Longer-dated futures will no doubt be introduced after the EU ETS’s 2020 reforms are agreed.

Economic reform coupled with zero sum financial market risk management products can solve climate change with capitalism. Climate change  has been the devatating result of a failure to apply orthodox economics.

The sooner it all gets back on track, the better for everyone.

Stewart Taggart is a former financial journalist and principal of Grenatec, a research organization studying the viability of a Pan-Asian Energy Infrastructure (PAEI).

Did you find this article useful? Join the EB Circle!

Your support helps keep our journalism independent and our content free for everyone to read. Join our community here.

Most popular

Featured Events

Publish your event
leaf background pattern

Transforming Innovation for Sustainability Join the Ecosystem →