Rich nations must eat less meat to tackle climate change - campaigners

The average person in Britain eats more than three times the government’s recommended 70 grams of red or processed meat each day.

Rich countries should encourage consumers to eat less meat and help farmers become more environmentally-friendly, campaigners said on Tuesday as pressure mounts to limit global warming.

Livestock - largely cattle raised for beef and milk - are responsible for about 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization says.

“If we want earth’s temperature rise to stay below 2 degrees, especially below 1.5 degrees … then we need to tackle this overconsumption of animal products,” said Nusa Urbancic, campaign director of Changing Markets Foundation, a lobby group.

The world risks sweltering heatwaves, extreme rainfall and shrinking harvests unless unprecedented efforts are made to keep the Earth’s temperature rise to 1.5 Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit), the United Nations said last week.

Meat consumption is more than double the recommended levels for healthy diets in the United States and much of Europe, Changing Markets Foundation and Washington-based Mighty Earth said in a report calling for reform of the food industry.

Cutting animal products from the diet would be a “relatively easy and cheap way” to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and free up land for conservation and storing carbon, they said.

If we want earth’s temperature rise to stay below 2 degrees, especially below 1.5 degrees … then we need to tackle this overconsumption of animal products.

Nusa Urbancic, campaign director, Changing Markets Foundation

For example, the average person in Britain eats more than three times the government’s recommended 70 grams of red or processed meat each day, the report said.

While more people are becoming vegan and vegetarian - particularly the young - governments continue to subsidise intensive meat and dairy farming methods that exacerbate climate change, it said.

“In Europe and the US, a lot of public money is spent on farming subsidies but very little of it goes to environmental measures,” Urbancic told the Thomson Reuters Foundation, calling for more support for organic farming.

There is a “shocking absence” of government policies to encourage consumers to eat less meat and to promote low-carbon alternative foods, unlike in the energy and transport sectors where reforms are receiving support, they said.

One country encouraging environmentally-friendly agriculture is Wales, where the government gives financial support to farms improving water management, maintaining biodiversity and combating climate change.

Tony Davies, a Welsh farmer benefitting from the scheme, has reduced his flock by two-thirds - to 600 animals - since 2005, which has reduced his overheads and boosted profits.

“The wildlife on the farm has increased as we have kept less stock,” he said by phone from Henfron Farm.

“More trees have had a chance to regenerate and we are storing higher levels of carbon.”

This story was published with permission from Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, women’s rights, trafficking, property rights, climate change and resilience. Visit http://news.trust.org)

 

Thanks for reading to the end of this story!

We would be grateful if you would consider joining as a member of The EB Circle. This helps to keep our stories and resources free for all, and it also supports independent journalism dedicated to sustainable development. It only costs as little as S$5 a month, and you would be helping to make a big difference.

Find out more and join The EB Circle

Advertisement
blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement

Most popular

View all news

Industry Spotlight

View all
Asia Pacific’s Hub For Collaboration On Sustainable Development
An Eco-Business initiative
The SDG Co