A report published by the World Economic Forum (WEF) has revealed that while most countries are making some progress to shift to more sustainable energy systems, the pace is insufficient to keep climate change in check.
Asian countries rank poorly in the Energy Transition Index (ETI) of the study, with Singapore leading the region in 12th position, Malaysia in 15th, but most South and Southeast Asian countries languishing from 50th to 70th position.
The ETI ranks countries based on the current performance of their energy system on three fronts – energy security and access, the environmental sustainability of the system, and the potential for inclusive economic growth and development. It also ranks a country’s potential to transition to a low-carbon energy future.
Among those three dimensions, environmental sustainability showed the lowest performance and improvement rates.
Between 2013 and 2018, 45 countries including Japan, China and India saw decreasing scores for environmental sustainability. This is due to rising air pollution and particulate emissions in more than half of the countries, causing around six million premature deaths globally each year, the report noted.
Energy intensity—a measure of the energy efficiency of a country’s economy—has improved and driven progress in environmental sustainability. Decreasing energy intensity and improving efficiency are two of the key levers to achieve the goals of the Paris climate agreement, reported WEF.
However, the current energy productivity improvement rate of 1.8 per cent per annum is falling short. The Energy Transitions Commission estimated that a reduction rate of three per cent per annum is required to limit global warming to below 2°C.
Energy access for all
Security and access remains the area with the widest disparity between highest and lowest performing countries.
Almost all countries without universal electricity access have seen progress. In absolute terms, however, the number of people without access to electricity is not declining quickly enough to meet the UN objective of universal electrification by 2030. There are still one billion people globally living without electricity.
Additionally, household electricity prices have been rising in real terms since 2013 in more than one half of countries globally, despite an overall fall in primary fuel prices.
The report also identified countries that demonstrate above average potential to transition to a low-carbon energy future despite a low ranking in the ETI. These countries included Asian economic powerhouses China and India.
China has the potential to leapfrog to a more sustainable energy system because of the government’s push to replace petrol vehicles with electric ones and a political commitment to address environmental challenges, including plans to introduce a carbon trading market.
China is already investing over $100 billion domestically on renewables every year, and has become the world’s largest investor in renewable energy overseas, strengthening its position among the leading countries in renewable energy supply chains.
However, China has the highest primary energy consumption and highest energy-based carbon emissions globally, and is also a big investor in fossil fuels projects beyond its borders. Within the ETI, China ranks in the bottom quartile and its environmental sustainability score is 30 percentage points below the average. The low environmental sustainability score is mainly due to China’s dependence on coal as the primary energy source.
China’s transition readiness indicates that it has made large efforts to prepare itself for the energy transition, despite its relatively unfavourable energy system structure.
India has also improved its performance by making strides in energy access and reducing fossil fuel subsidies. The country has taken a series of bold measures, particularly on renewables deployment and energy efficiency, and ranks as an “emerging country”.
India’s energy needs are primarily met by fossil fuels (74 per cent of its primary energy supply), which impacts the country’s environmental sustainability score and means rising energy import costs.
Furthermore, a considerable share of India’s population still lacks access to electricity and clean cooking fuel. In the ETI, India ranks in 78th place.
Between 2013 and 2018, India improved its performance score by 5.6 percentage points, mainly with improved energy access, reduced subsidies and reduced import costs. However, the road to continuous access to power and clean cooking fuel for all is long; India still has the largest share of people globally who lack electricity access.
The future of energy
Even in today’s environment of fast-paced technological advancement, successful energy transition and system improvement will not happen overnight, the report noted.
While more than 80 per cent of countries have improved their energy systems, more effort is needed to tackle the world’s energy-related challenges.
WEF proposed three recommendations: establish favourable conditions for energy system stakeholders, target improvement across all three dimensions, and pursue strategies with wide-ranging impact across systems.
One suggestion is to remove fossil fuel subsidies and reduce energy intensity, which have been shown to be beneficial on multiple fronts: energy security, sustainability and inclusive economic growth.
The report also encourages countries to benchmark themselves against comparable peer groups—such as geographical and development status—to identify good examples and develop suitable improvement strategies.
Fatih Birol, executive director, International Energy Agency and co-chair of stewardship board, World Economic Forum, said: “There is an urgent need to speed up the transition towards more sustainable energy production and use. To do this we will need to harness energy technologies and deepen cooperation between governments, industry and stakeholders.”
Thanks for reading to the end of this story!
We would be grateful if you would consider joining as a member of The EB Circle. This helps to keep our stories and resources free for all, and it also supports independent journalism dedicated to sustainable development. It only costs as little as S$5 a month, and you would be helping to make a big difference.