European scientists have just identified another great emitter of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide – and the guilty party is that standing body of water known as a lake.
The world’s 117 million or so lakes together release about a quarter as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as humans do by burning fossil fuels, according to new research.
The difference is that the carbon dioxide comes mostly from natural, renewable sources and is part of a natural cycle. Humans have survived – and one day will again –without fossil fuels, but they cannot survive without lakes.
So the study in Nature Geoscience by Gesa Weyhenmeyer, an ecologist at Uppsala University in Sweden, and colleagues from Denmark, the Netherlands and Brazil is another piece of basic research that adds to human understanding of how the carbon cycle works.
It is also another piece of information available to climate scientists as they try to model the impact of increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide on the planet’s climate.
That is because, as the world warms, many of the world’s lakes will probably release even more of the greenhouse gas to the atmosphere.
Carbon dioxide in lakes, marshes, reservoirs and ponds comes from two sources: from micro-organisms that make a living in the water, and from the soil and rock around the water.
Professor Weyhenmeyer and her fellow scientists decided to take a closer look at the process in 5,118 lakes in Sweden.
They already knew the levels of alkalinity and acidity and the temperatures of each, and they measured the surface water concentrations of dissolved CO2 and the levels of release to the atmosphere in autumn. In short, they considered the lakes as wet chimneys.
They found that emissions varied with concentration, local temperature and the way the land around the lake was used. They also established that, in most cases, the greater part of carbon dioxide came not from living organisms but from material and nutrients that had been washed into the lake from the surrounding catchment area.
Humans have survived – and one day will again –without fossil fuels, but they cannot survive without lakes.
The smaller lakes with the highest dissolved carbon and phosphorus, and the longest ice-free seasons, had the highest emissions. They could release twice as much as the comparable lakes in the colder and more densely forested regions of Sweden, and were very like emissions from lakes further south in the subtropics and tropics.
The take-home message is that as agriculture expands, and the planet continues to warm, the still waters of 100 million lakes will respond by releasing more of the gas that in turn adds more warming. Engineers call this process positive feedback.
“There is considerable risk that carbon dioxide emissions from lakes and water courses − especially those in northern Scandinavia, Canada and Russia − will increase as the climate warms up,” Professor Weyhenmeyer says. “And it is in these areas that most of the lakes are located.”
Thanks for reading to the end of this story!
We would be grateful if you would consider joining as a member of The EB Circle. This helps to keep our stories and resources free for all, and it also supports independent journalism dedicated to sustainable development. It only costs as little as S$5 a month, and you would be helping to make a big difference.